In the case of Newsom v Trump (25-4870), the opposition to the motion for a temporary restraining order is due by 11:00 A.M. on Wednesday, June 11, 2025. Plaintiffs may file a response to that opposition by 9:00 A.M. on Thursday, June 12, 2025. The Court will hold a hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion in open court at 1:30 P.M. on Thursday, June 12, 2025. Any party wishing to appear by Zoom may do so.
In addition to seats in Judge Breyer’s courtroom, there will be an overflow space with live audio and video next door in Courtroom 5. No seats will be reserved for media.
Members of the public may remotely access the hearing through this Zoom link. There is a 1,000 participant cap to the Zoom webinar.
Please click the link below to join webinars (public hearings). If you are a case participant, you will join as an attendee, then you will be brought into the proceeding by court staff.
https://cand-uscourts.zoomgov.com/j/1611472837?pwd=cy81NUdINWZmeEpFUjlHRXM3djZ5QT09
Webinar ID: 161 147 2837
Password: 785243
Date: June 5, 2026 District: 05 – Santa Barbara, San Luis Obispo, Monterey, San Benito, and…
No campfires outside of designated campsites and day use areas listed in Appendix A below:…
(c)Kate Novoa Matt Moberg I think every human being eventually has a moment where they…
Note: the current expectation is that this light will be active thru the 2028 Big…
To all those who made the ultimate sacrifice for our county, and an apology for…
This website uses cookies.
View Comments
Before the Orange Man got elected, there was a notable bipartisan immigration bill, known as the
Border Act of 2024 (S.4361), which was not supported by Donald Trump and subsequently failed in the Senate. I don't claim to know if this bill was the best for America/Immigrants but it was defeated so he could carry on his nonsense. Next there is his "Birthday" Parade. It's never ending. So sad.
Any idea what time zone these times are for? Thnx.
Thank you Kate, for keeping us informed
I zoomed into arguments. Incredible to hear especially Trumps DOJs team arguing for unchecked oversight. Loved hearing the discussion on what going through the governor means. Based on the questions sounded like the judge will side with Newsom on national guard but not take up the marines issue yet.
I zoomed in for arguments, too. It was fascinating. He did grill the USAG, which I loved. I agree. Sounds like he is going to side with Newsom.