Big Sur

Visual Access in Big Sur & The Big Sur Land Use Plan

Why Big Sur Chose Visual Access

One of the most common misunderstandings about the Big Sur Coast Land Use Plan is the belief that it limits public access.

It does not.

Big Sur offers countless opportunities for physical access through public beaches, state parks, national forest lands, hiking trails, campgrounds, scenic pullouts, and recreation areas.

The question facing the authors of the Land Use Plan was never whether the public should have access to Big Sur.

The question was:

What type of access best protects this extraordinary coastline for future generations?

Big Sur Is Different

Unlike many other parts of California’s coast, Big Sur is defined by steep mountains, fragile ecosystems, narrow canyons, limited infrastructure, and one of the most spectacular scenic landscapes in the world.

The planners recognized that attempting to maximize physical access everywhere would eventually require:

* more parking lots,

* more restrooms,

* more trails,

* more signs,

* more roadside facilities,

* more development.

Ironically, providing more physical access would gradually diminish the very landscape people came to experience.

A Different Philosophy

Instead of emphasizing physical access throughout the coast, the Big Sur Coast Land Use Plan adopted a different principle.

It recognized that the landscape itself is the public resource.

That is why the LUP states:

“Visual access should be emphasized throughout Big Sur as an appropriate response to the needs of visitors.”

This was a deliberate planning decision.

The public would continue to experience Big Sur primarily by traveling Highway 1 through an extraordinary, largely undeveloped landscape.

Protecting that experience became the foundation of the Land Use Plan.

Visual Access Is Public Access

Some people mistakenly assume that emphasizing visual access means denying public access.

The opposite is true.

Every person who travels Highway 1 experiences Big Sur’s visual access.

Millions of people each year enjoy one of the world’s great scenic drives because previous generations chose to protect the landscape rather than fill it with additional development.

At the same time, Big Sur continues to provide abundant opportunities for physical access through its parks, beaches, trails, campgrounds, and public lands.

The Land Use Plan simply recognized that physical access should not come at the expense of the landscape itself.

Why This Matters Today

As new generations of planners and decision-makers become involved in Big Sur, it is important to understand that the Big Sur Coast Land Use Plan did not accidentally emphasize visual access.

It did so because the people who created the plan understood that Big Sur could never accommodate unlimited physical access without losing the qualities that make it unique.

The question has never been:

“How can we create more access?”

The question is:

“How do we preserve the experience of Big Sur while providing appropriate public access?”

For more than forty years, the answer has been clear:

Protect the landscape first.

Everything else follows from that principle.

Public Access — Keep Big Sur Wild

bigsurkate

Appointed appellate counsel for indigent defendants (retired.) I have lived in Big Sur since 1984, first on the north coast, and on the South Coast since 1989.

View Comments

  • Over the last 30 years I have made often twice yearly visits to Big Sur from the East coast, and over that time its magnificent landscape has become a part of my own inner landscape. What Kate describes here is a very wise plan.

  • What a wonderful Land Use Plan you all have. Without it, Big Sur would look just like any other urbanized coastal community along the California Coast. Thank you Kate!

  • KEEP BIG SUR WILD!!! If the public can't utilize the existing access to trail and the ocean, then go to Santa Monica, or hiking the other mountains of So. Cal. Big Sur needs to be preserved. How about making it a State or National Park with a hefty entrance fee. Those who live and work there would get permanent entrance cards. If it isn't preserved it will be ruined more than it already is. I lived at Lucia for 30+ years beginning in the 1950s and it was peaceful and respected. It is heartbreaking to see it like Disneyland... over-run.

  • And yet, as a landowner, I have been restricted from protecting land from the public (after 2 years of working with the county) and ‘encouraged’ to open up our land to the public…no…we will continue to maintain our property and protect it from the public…

Share
Published by
bigsurkate

Recent Posts

Road Construction — Big Sur Only

I’m not going to be publishing the entire list each week, but here are the…

2 days ago

MoCo leads challenge on Gilroy ICE facility

County of Monterey ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE Sonia M. De La Rosa COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER 168 West…

3 days ago

Broken Window Philosophy

In Sociology 101, the “Broken Windows Philosophy” is taught to illustrate that people will treat…

5 days ago

Stop the War!

Stop the War with Iran!Emergency Action: Tuesday, July 28th, 4-6pmWindow on the BaySponsored by Veterans for…

5 days ago

Full Overnight Closure near Pt. Sur extended one more night for Monday 7/27/26

Date:Friday, July 24, 2026District:05 – Santa Barbara, San Luis Obispo, Monterey, San Benito, and Santa Cruz…

1 week ago

This website uses cookies.