Drones & the Marine Sanctuary

This came up at the BSMAAC meeting yesterday, and many locals don’t seem to know this, particularly given the photos they post on FB taken of their house on the edge from a position over the ocean. Drones are not allowed to go over 400’ I am told, but have not personally verified.

The zones include coastal waters from the mean high tide line seaward to distances of up to 5 nautical miles offshore. For more information about NOAA overflight regulations within MBNMS and othermarine sanctuaries on the west coast, visit the National Marine Sanctuaries webpage “Pilots: Know Before You Go!”.

Resource Issues: Aircraft, Model Aircraft, & Drones

drone aircraft over surfOverview of the Issue:

Marine animals, such as sea lions, seals, otters, whales, and birds are found throughout the sanctuary. While some use water and land areas near human populations, most prefer remote habitats, free of disturbance from human activity. Seabirds are often the most sensitive to human disturbance and select coastal cliffs and offshore rocks as preferred resting and nesting sites. Seals and sea lions often share these same or similar remote sites to avoid human activities that startle them, causing stress and serious physiological responses to that stress. Severe and/or repeated disturbance of wildlife can interrupt feeding and sleeping patterns, resulting in weight loss, fatigue, weakened immune systems, sickness, and even death. Sudden disturbances can flush animals off rookeries and nesting colonies, causing direct injury and mortality to eggs and young animals as adults scramble in panic. Disturbances can cause indirect injury by exposing eggs and young animals to cold, heat, predators, dehydration, starvation, and stress during the absence of adult protectors.

drone aircraft with camera model aircraft

Motorized aerial vehicles, whether traditionally piloted aircraft or unmanned aircraft systems (e.g. model aircraft, quadcopters, drones, etc.), can pose a special threat to marine animals due to their ability to access areas generally free of human presence. Aerial vehicles can appear suddenly and cause disturbance by sight, sound, and movement. To some wildlife, a hovering or circling aircraft or drone exhibits characteristics similar to a predator bird, such as a hawk, falcon or seagull. To other wildlife, the whir or hum of a motor is indicative of human presence – something most wild animals instinctively avoid for protection and self-preservation. They equate such disturbance as an immediate and serious threat, and their typical response is to flee quickly. Even if they remain, the animals often continue in an elevated alert posture, on guard against a potential return of the perceived threat. This takes a toll as well. Imagine the impact of a stranger frequently peering into the windows of your home at night. Even if no crime were ever perpetrated, the stress of such uncertain intrusion into your place of rest could begin to have significant effects on your stress level and health. It is no less the case for wild animals, particularly those preparing to give birth or raising young.

The sudden increase in availability and use of of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) is requiring special attention by natural resource managers across the United States, both in the marine and terrestrial environment.

aircraft flying along delta

How is the Sanctuary involved?

Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary (MBNMS) addresses overflight disturbance through a mix of educational outreach, regulatory, and enforcement approaches. Educational outreach efforts are described in greater detail under Resource Issues: Wildlife Disturbance.

Sanctuary regulations explicitly prohibit harassment of marine mammals, turtles, and birds by any means, including disturbance from the air. All of the marine mammal and turtle species, and most birds that frequent the sanctuary, are also protected under the Endangered Species ActMarine Mammal Protection Act, or Migratory Bird Treaty Act everywhere within the United States and its territories.

In addition to the general prohibition against disturbance of marine mammals, turtles, and birds, sanctuary regulations prohibit the operation of motorized aircraft (including model aircraft, quadcopters, drones, etc.) within within four NOAA regulated overflight zones in the sanctuary. If a flying apparatus of any kind has a motor, then it must remain above 1000 feet altitude within the four zones. The zones include coastal waters from the mean high tide line seaward to distances of up to 5 nautical miles offshore. For more information about NOAA overflight regulations within MBNMS and other marine sanctuaries on the west coast, visit the National Marine Sanctuaries webpage “Pilots: Know Before You Go!”.

Sanctuary regulations allow for the operation of piloted aircraft or unmanned aircraft systems within NOAA regulated overflight zones if aircraft operators receive prior authorization from MBNMS. Permit requests are evaluated based upon the design and purpose of proposed low-altitude flight operations. Permits have been issued in the past for research and education flights that benefit sanctuary resource protection and management. Permits include conditions that limit collateral impacts to wildlife from flight operations. Some flight operations for production of television commercials and movies have been authorized where strict controls and careful planning prevent direct and incidental disturbance of wildlife in the project area. To request a permit to operate any motorized aircraft, including UAS/drones, in NOAA regulated overflight zones, go to the MBNMS webpage for permit requests.

NOAA’s Office of National Marine Sanctuaries occasionally conducts aircraft operations within a sanctuary using traditional aircraft or UAS, generally for research or general surveillance purposes. MBNMS applies constraints upon its own aircraft operations when they are conducted within the NOAA regulated overflight zones. The Office of National Marine Sanctuaries has been testing a 13-pound UAS known as the “Puma” for several years to determine how this remotely controlled aircraft can aid in large-scale marine protected area management. The system is being tested in several marine sanctuaries around the country, and requires detailed mission planning, as well as flight authorization by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). It represents the next development in marine resource monitoring, since it is cheaper, greener, and safer than manned flights.

The question of UAS/drone operation across the country (including over marine protected areas) is receiving considerable discussion and debate. If a need arises to update sanctuary regulations or regulatory definitions to better manage UAS activities within MBNMS, NOAA’s Office of National Marine Sanctuaries will provide information on this website and elsewhere.

For questions and answers about FAA policy regarding unmanned aircraft systems (e.g. model aircraft and drones), visit FAA’s website.

Overflight Map

~ by bigsurkate on October 29, 2018.

5 Responses to “Drones & the Marine Sanctuary”

  1. You’re correct on the 400′ – it’s 400′ above ground level (AGL), so you can’t fly a drone higher than 400′ above the ocean, and the MBNMS no fly zone is up to 1000′, effectively excluding drones from their no fly zones, which as your map shows, for the Big Sur area, starts at the Carmel River and goes south to around Cambria – and as you said starts at the mean high tide and goes out 3Nm.

    The State Parks have their own rules to effectively ban drones over their land too (though there’s a drone stuck in a tree near McWay falls that’s been there for a couple of years now – it’s so embedded that winter storms have not dislodged it!)

    You see signs at some private properties along the coast saying drone flights are prohibited over their property, which is false – the FAA regulates the air space above a property, so unless there are other reasons why you can’t fly there, by default you can (and to note that the MBNMS no fly zone is a FAA zone) , you just have to launch and land from outside the property.

    Also, you can’t fly over people that are not directly part of your crew (which means you and a spotter you might have), which includes active highways (ie, Highway 1 itself) and effectively all the busy pullouts at the side of 1.

    I looked into all this as I was thinking of getting a drone myself and Big Sur would have been one of the places I’d have taken it – but once it became apparent how few places there were I could legally fly, I never bothered.

    Like

  2. Thanks for all the clarification, Tim.

    https://bigsurkate.blog

    Like

  3. What about the potential of a crashed drone sparking and starting a fire?

    Like

  4. I live on the west side of highway where drones have become an almost daily problem for me. Who would have ever thought you would have to worry about flying cameras invading your property and privacy. Here are some examples of this huge increase in drone usage that is impacting the quality of life in Big Sur.
    This past Friday I came across a man who had climbed two fences with “No Trespassing” signs on them and was close to one of the houses on property. I confronted him thinking he was there to burglarize the house but instead he was down snooping around looking for his drone that he had crashed. Check the cover of this weeks Carmel Pine Cone about the dangerous rescue of a drone operator who lost his drone at Julia Pfeiffer Burns State Park.
    Also recently, and this has happened several times, I was out working when I heard horses running frantically around the property and neighing loudly. When I went to check on them there was a drone following them around from about fifteen feet above. If you are unaware, the sight and sound of a drone spooks livestock!
    I frequently have these flying above my house and deck or even when my family and I are enjoying the beach. The operators are often times over a mile away in a pullout along Highway One. My friends who live in Bixby Canyon don’t even want to go and enjoy their beach anymore due to the fact that there are constantly drones flying above them.
    I could go on and on but my point is that this problem has escalated so rapidly and bound to get much worse in the near future. I believe that drones should be banned altogether in Big Sur because of the Marine Sanctuary and the fact that people are disturbing birds and marine life everyday, they are illegal in State Parks and everything else for the most part is private property.
    You wouldn’t want people flying their drone around your house and backyard so If you plan on bringing your drone to Big Sur remember that people do live here and one of the main reasons residents chose to do so was for our privacy! Thank you.

    Like

  5. Speaking of stampeding horses, just recently there was another drone operator harassing cattle while filming over at another area ranch – viewing the footage, you could tell that the cows were spooked. His lead in line to his Post was, “disturbing the cows.” Drone owners should be aware of their surroundings (power lines, trees, animals, people, etc.), operators too must have eye contact with their drone at all times also. And maybe everyone should take the time and read up on California Civil Code section 1708.8 Trespassing over private property (land or air) with any recording devices …

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

 
%d bloggers like this: